Nancy Pelosi – Sleeping With The Enemy?
Quotes from a level headed conservative (revsam) and an idiot (influsion) on a conservative forum.
Main Article: It doesn’t seem to matter to Pelosi that she is giving terrorist states legitimacy. […] The Associated Press release was entitled: “White House Doesn’t Support House Speaker Pelosi’s Visit to Syria, Saturday , March 31, 2007 which began: “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will visit Syria, a country President Bush has shunned as a sponsor of terrorism, despite being asked by the administration not to go.â€
influsion: Yeah, Nancy Pelosi is so hot, the enemy can’t resist her.
OMG, do you know anything about diplomacy and its purpose? All the enemy wants is legitimacy.
I think they’d rather obtain their legitimacy by getting some attention from Pelosi than sponsoring terrorists[…]
revsam5: Who in the world would want to sleep with Pelosi anyways? Must be aweful desperate!
Talk with the soldiers, as one who has posted here I think, about what is truthfully going on over in Iraq. Areas that have water for the first time in their history; schools being built; hospitals being rebuilt and restocked with supplies; sewer systems working properly; Hussein gone; yeah sounds like a big waste of time, huh?
Oh yeah, if Pelosi was truly representing American sentiment, then according to what I read and hear, she’s telling lies. Its the Democrats who want to cut and run. The generals who are there in Iraq are saying that cutting and running would be the worst thing. But since when did Pelosi ever truthfully tell the truth? Never.
influsion: revsam, “The generals who are there in Iraq are saying that cutting and running would be the worst thing.”
The ones that aren’t keep getting cut and and replaced by ones who do. Then again that’s a Red Herring argument since it has nothing to do with Pelosi’s visit.
“Talk with soldiers“. I tried talking to 3000, but they were all dead. It’s difficult to know if they approve of the war post-mortem.
Share This