Ron Paul receives the most military donations among Republicans AGAIN in Q3
It appears our military backs Ron Paul in the most important issue facing the United States: Terrorism and our foreign policy. For the second time in a row, Ron Paul receives more donations among Republicans. Data for Democrats is not yet available, but Ron Paul crushed Democrats in this statistic last quarter as well.
Candidate [Air Force] [Army] [Navy] [Marines] [Coast Guard] [Other*] [Total]
Brownback [151] [0] [0] [0] [0] [250] [401]
Cox [0] [0] [0] [0] [0] [0] [0]
Guiliani [1,250] [750] [1,500] [1,000] [0] [0] [4,500]
Huckabee [2,050] [1,200] [2,850] [0] [250] [260] [6,610]
Hunter [0] [500] [0] [0] [0] [30] [530]
McCain [4,120] [7,972] [6,645] [1,721] [100] [800] [21,358]
Paul [7,450] [17,998.96] [7,227.76] [2,740] [800] [4,200] [40,416.72]
Romney [500] [3,410] [750] [800] [0] [250] [5,710]
Thompson [4,800] [5,825] [6,350] [800] [23] [2,600] [20,398]
Ron Paul: $40K
McCain: $21K
Thompson: $20K
This data is sourced from FEC Reports for Q3 and was compiled here by jfletch and RP4.US
*This list uses donators who listed their employer as some variation of Air Force, Army, National Guard, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Retired Vet, Veteran, Civilian Military employee, or Military (no branch indicated). This is preliminary data and may contain insignificant errors.
Ron Paul led in military contributions last quarter as well.
Pingback by GordonUnleashed » Blog Archive » Military Donors Spam Ron Paul's Bank Account (Again) | October 15th, 2007
[...] in raising funds from people who listed a DoD deparment or agency as their employer. One website reports the following: Ron Paul: $40K McCain: $21K Thompson: [...]
Comment by Steve LaBianca | October 16th, 2007
I wonder how the donation stack up by actual servicemen and women deployed overseas, and totals by currently serving as armed forces “soldiers”.
Comment by Will Kone | October 16th, 2007
Good question Steve. I’m not sure how we could find that out with the FEC documents. I would expect that donations from those deployed would be much less than those at home because the deployed have a lot less time to deal with day to day “trivia” like how next falls election is going.
That is just a guess. It is very likely I’m way off.
Comment by somebody | October 16th, 2007
Again, though, doesn’t this only count those who give more than $200? Since then they have to name an employer? If so, I wonder how the hypothesis that Ron Paul may be getting money from higher ranked members of the military works out, since I’m assuming that they get paid better and, thus, can afford to donate more. Would that make sense? I’m not too sure of all the details containing these FEC reports, but I do remember a lot of criticism the last time around that Paul was told to have gotten the “most” donations from the military.
Comment by BoruJudasDedrich | October 16th, 2007
I heard that 50% of the vets-that-donated donated to Ron Paul.
Can anyone confirm/link with source?
Pingback by truthseeds.org » Blog Archive » A Ron Paul Republic = Something akin to World Peace | October 16th, 2007
[...] and women of our military clearly support Ron Paul’s proposed humble foreign policy and have donated more money to Dr. Paul’s campaign than any other candidate. They are saying NO to endless war and continued war [...]
Comment by Jeff Molby | October 16th, 2007
Any chance you could do a similar comparison by industry?
It would probably take a lot of work, but it would be a body blow to show clear, indisputable numbers of how certain individuals gain a ton of money from certain interests.
Pingback by Smart Remarks » Blog Archive » Paul’s haul | October 17th, 2007
[...] Figures are out for this quarter: Paul doubled his take to $40,416.72. His nearest Republican rival, John McCain, collected $21,358. [...]
Pingback by Military supports Ron Paul « The Incontiguous Brick | October 17th, 2007
[...] On the thespinfactor.com: [...]
Comment by eaglescout | October 17th, 2007
To Jeff Molby – Good question. You will find it at opensecrets once the numbers are in: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/ then click on selected industries. Right now they only have the data for the 2nd quarter, but not the third.
Comment by Ally Kendall | October 17th, 2007
It is encouraging to see that the majority of the people who take the oath to protect and defend the constitution of the united states from all enemies, foreign and domestic, take that oath seriously enough to put their money behind it.
Pingback by Dr. Rep. Generalissimo Ronaldo Paul plans to orchestrate grass roots military-backed coup « Dominionists for Tancredo 2008—If we build it, He will come | October 18th, 2007
[...] before bedtime last night, I witnessed two disturbing Interblog reports here and here, from some of the best Interbloggers in the business, reporting that the ‘military [...]
Pingback by GordonUnleashed » Blog Archive » Ron Paul and the Neocon Squirm | October 19th, 2007
[...] doesn’t matter how you slice it or dice it, the military loves them some Ron [...]
Comment by verta | November 5th, 2007
People can NOT keep brushing the social security issue aside – it is downright ignorant. You will have thousands of homeless disabled and elderly if you ‘do away’ with it. Do you all think you will be young and strong forever? Are you honestly that short sighted? (I’m only 31 years old and NOT on govt assistance btw.) Veterans are not the only people deserving of having their disability benefits ensured.
People with family and friends who are in dire need of their disability need to speak up LOUDLY and OFTEN on the Ron Paul websites! You should be very afraid, this old man hasn’t a clue about disabled people, despite being a doctor! There are only so many positions for wal-mart door greeter for disabled people, those genuinely in need of SS/disability can’t do much else. And it COULD be any of us, anytime. Please take a step back and think about this even if it doesn’t impact you immediately.
PEOPLE WHO ARE UNABLE TO WORK WILL NOT HAVE ANY MONEY. What then? He is opposed to state-assisted suicide… which would be the only way to avoid becoming homeless, for MANY of these people. No matter how young you are now, one day you, too WILL be elderly and in need of a social security program to take care of you. Pensions are weaker than ever before, and non-existant in many places today that they used to be commonplace. Please THINK.
Comment by Freddy | December 2nd, 2007
GordonUnleashed: “doesn’t matter how you slice it or dice it, the military loves them some Ron”
All this “proves” is that Ron Paul supporters “loves them some publicity-seeking donation stunts.”
Prove there is validity in any of this. Prove that the Ron Paul donors claiming to be military actually ARE military. Prove that this is not just another coordinated stunt like the “most donations in a single day” stunt that got big headlines but amounted to very little.
Ron Paul’s percentage of alleged military donors sure appears to have taken off ever since Ron Paul supporters starting trying to spin these numbers as “no matter how you slice it or dice it, the military loves them some Ron.”
If it turns out that Ron Paul donors are LYING and claiming a FALSE military affiliation, will you CONDEMN THEM?
Comment by BOris | December 5th, 2007
Freddy, what evidence do you have that these supporters are lying and spinning numbers around? Cuss Hannity of Fox says so? Fact is that Ron Paul is gaining a lot of momentum and has a searious chance at the primaries, no matter how much the news downplays him or ignores him. I am from Pensacola Florida, and I see mroe Ron Paul signs and supporters then any of the other supporters combined. I don’t know many people who are politicaly active who actualy want guliani or romney as president.
And about the SS issue from above. He is not getting rid of it for everyone. You have the option of doing it under his plan. Also, anyone who has already been paying the tax for so long (idk how long), will still be getting it. Problem is people have this idea that the government is here to help you out all through your life. You depend on the federal government for everything. This mentality is what is bringing the country down more than anything (my opinion). We are enducing a welfare state which is leading to socialism. I personaly enjoy our republic. If you want a socialistic country, go somewhere else.
Comment by Freddy | December 6th, 2007
BOris says “Freddy, what evidence do you have that these supporters are lying and spinning numbers around?”
1) I notice that you FAIL to answer the question, BOris. I didn’t say I had proof they are lying. I asked if they are lying by claiming a FALSE military affiliation, will you CONDEMN THEM? Will you?
2) If Ron Paul’s campaign is fudging the numbers, will you reject the campaign?
BOris: “I don’t know many people who are politicaly active who actualy want guliani or romney as president.”
3) Of course not. Who could want them for president? They support Bush’s failures in Iraq and will throw more Americans into the meat grinder for Bush’s oil buddies. It is clear that the thinking Republicans have gone to Ron Paul. Too bad Ron Paul is a hypocrite who sells out his principles for power, as I have pointed out.
BOris: “If you want a socialistic country, go somewhere else.”
4) Have you failed to notice that we already ARE a socialist country? We have socialized education. We have socialized retirement. We have socialized military, etc. “Problem is people have this idea that the government is here to help you out all through your life” by protecting you from enemies. Why should the government hire an army for you?
Comment by Sand | December 6th, 2007
To 17. (3) Giuliani is just like Hillary. So why would you want Hillary for president?
Comment by Freddy | December 7th, 2007
Sand lies by saying: “To 17. (3) Giuliani is just like Hillary.”
On major issues Clinton and Giuliani are poles apart.
End the Republicans’ failed Iraq War:
Giuliani- No
Clinton- Yes
Paul- Yes
Federal Intrusions Into Personal Privacy with Big Government Restrictions on Abortion:
Clinton- No
Giuliani- Yes
Paul- Yes
Cut Corporate Tax Breaks:
Clinton- Yes
Giuliani- No
Paul- No
Reform health care and stop insurance companies from dropping citizen’s health coverage
Clinton- Yes
Giuliani- No
Paul- No
Fight Global Warming:
Clinton: Yes
Giuliani: No
Ron Paul: No
Looks like Republican Giuliani and Republican Paul HAVE MUCH MORE IN COMMON than Clinton.
Sand fails again. So your question rebounds on you.
“With the notable exception of Iraq, Giuliani is (mostly) like RON PAUL. So why would you want Paul for president?”
Comment by Sand | December 8th, 2007
Actually, Clinton keeps voting for the Iraq War, which Giuliani supports.
Clinton voted for the Patriot Act which Giuliani supports
Clinton and Giuliani actively talk about pursuing Iran, or in the least protecting Israel at any cost, and not allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons at any cost.
They both support the war on drugs.
They are both authoritarians. Giuliani banned ferrets and jay walking in NY. Hillary wants to ban violent video games.
Pingback by On Schedule to Break Another Record » The Truth @ The Spin Factor | December 16th, 2007
[...] all, Ron Paul has consistently received more donations from active duty military, and has already broken the 12 million mark. Share [...]
Pingback by Ron Paul Raises 6 Million in One Day » The Truth @ The Spin Factor | December 17th, 2007
[...] He is only one million away from breaking Barack Obama’s total for last quarter, and as usual, Ron Paul is expected to take the biggest share of donations from active duty [...]
Comment by Freddy | December 17th, 2007
Hey, thespinfactor.com: Nice job removing posts that DISPROVE YOUR PRO-PAUL PROPAGANDA.
So much for being “open-minded and neutral.” Is your little website afraid of TRUTH?
Here’s a repost:
21. Comment by Freddy | December 11th, 2007
I like how Sand uses the word “actually” before Sand distorts, misleads and LIES!
Sand “Actually, Clinton keeps voting for the Iraq War, which Giuliani supports.”
1) Prove it.
Yes, Clinton voted for the original resolution on force and for funding. But you said she “keeps” voting for the Iraq war. So prove it. What votes are these?
2) Are you aware that since Bush’s Iraq war lies have been revealed, Clinton “keeps” voting AGAINST the Republicans and the Iraq war?
Clinton, Obama vote ‘no’ on Senate Iraq bill
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18862112/
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/23/clinton.iraq/index.html
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton said Sunday she won’t vote for any more money to support the four-year-old war in Iraq without a plan to start bringing U.S. troops home.
“I’ve reached the conclusion that the best way to support our troops is begin bringing them home,” the New York senator and former first lady told CNN’s “Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer.”
3) Sand, are you aware that right up to now, Clinton has been voting AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS to get Senate ratification on the Responsible Iraq Redeployment Appropriations Act?
Sand “Clinton voted for the Patriot Act which Giuliani supports”
4) Sand: “Clinton voted for the Patriot Act which Giuliani supports” True but VERY MISLEADING. Clinton is on record that it needs amending and has been implemented improperly. Giuliani is NOT.
Read what Clinton has to say about the Patriot Act’s “tremendous potential for abuse.”
http://www.senate.gov/~clinton/news/statements/details.cfm?id=249895
5) Sand “Hillary wants to ban violent video games.”
Here Sand tells an outright LIE. I challenge you to PROVE IT.
Comment by Sand | December 17th, 2007
I’m busy, but I’ll answer 5 for now: http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2005/12/01/clinton_law-051201.html
Comment by Freddy | December 19th, 2007
Sand “I’m busy, but I’ll answer 5 for now:”
So Sand is too “busy” to answer questions that PROVE HIM WRONG, but not too “busy” to get into new debates on other pages. LOL!
I have PROVEN that Giuliani’s political positions are MUCH CLOSER to Paul than to Clinton. And Sand has fled from any more defense of his old position.
6) Sand: “Hillary wants to ban violent video games.”
Did you actually read beyond the headline to read the actual article you linked?
The ban that Clinton supports is not “violent video games”, but rather their SALE TO CHILDREN.
The legislation “would ban the sale of violent video games to children.”
LOL! Sand fails again! Will he man up and admit it?
Comment by Sand | December 19th, 2007
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/ban
2: to prohibit especially by legal means ; also : to prohibit the use, performance, or distribution of
The fact that I wasn’t specific doesn’t do anything for you. I can say you “FAIL” because you weren’t specific enough to lay out the entire legislation, which does more than ban the sale of violent video games to minors.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-2126
Of course instead of saying anything substantive, you want to argue syntax and semantics. How short-sighted.
Comment by Freddy | December 19th, 2007
Sand argues syntax and semantics, and then goes on to criticize “arguing syntax and semantics.”
LOL! More psychological projection from Sand!
I am not challenging the definition of “ban.” When it came to violent video games, Clinton tried to ban THE SALE TO CHILDREN.
She did NOT try to ban violent video games! Violent video games themselves would NOT be “prohibited especially by legal means ; also : prohibited in the use, performance, or distribution of!”
Violent video games would still be for sale to adults, and therefore NOT BANNED!
Sand gripes “The fact that I wasn’t specific doesn’t do anything for you.”
The fact that you were WRONG about the substance of the ban is just like the ways you were WRONG about Obama’s record, etc. It is not a matter of failing to be specific enough. You made accusations that are NOT TRUE.
Sand: ” I can say you “FAIL” because you weren’t specific enough to lay out the entire legislation, which does more than ban the sale of violent video games to minors.”
7) You could IF anywhere in the entire legislation, violent video games are BANNED! But violent video games would continue to be for sale in stores in the US, and not banned. Right?
Comment by Sand | December 19th, 2007
“Sand argues syntax and semantics, and then goes on to criticize “arguing syntax and semantics.””
Yes, I was showing you what you did, the difference is my response was relevant to your response. While yours wasn’t.
You are still missing the point. Hillary is just as authoritarian as the Republicans both you and I despise so much.
“But violent video games would continue to be for sale in stores in the US, and not banned. Right?”
No. Their sale would be restricted based on her misunderstanding of technology.
“True or false: “Ron Paul supports Bush’s plans to invade and overthrow Muslim leaders”?”
Ron Paul specifically said: “Mr. Speaker, my guess is that in the not-too-distant future so-called proof will be provided that Saddam Hussein was somehow partially responsible for the attack on the United States, and it will be irresistible then for the United States to retaliate against him. This will greatly and dangerously expand the war and provoke even greater hatred towards the United States, and it is all so unnecessary. It is so hard for many Americans to understand how we inadvertently provoke the Arab Muslim people, and I am not talking about the likes of bin Laden and his gang. I am talking about the Arab Muslim masses.”
As you can see Ron Paul opposed this in 2001. If you are talking about his vote to approve a retaliation against our attackers in Afghanistan, you should first know that he introduced legislation calling for the Constitutional use of Letters of Marque (look it up in the Constitution), which would only approve force against our attackers, not specifically elected Muslim leaders, as you insidiously suggest.
Pingback by Wolf Blitzer: Ron Paul gets more military donations than all other candidates combine | February 15th, 2008
[...] Blitzer: Ron Paul gets more military donations than all other candidates combine Ron Paul receives the most military donations among Republicans AGAIN in Q3 ? The Truth @ The Spin F… __________________ "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude [...]
Pingback by The need for consequentialist libertarianism » The Truth @ The Spin Factor | April 28th, 2009
[...] Paul’s views on foreign policy were so popular that members of the U.S. Military appeared to favor Ron Paul over now-President Barack Obama, and Senator John McCain; counter-intuitively [...]
Comment by sandrar | September 10th, 2009
Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog.
Cheers! Sandra. R.
Pingback by Fox News Dirty Tricks Against Ron Paul No “Mistake” | Dark Politricks | February 17th, 2011
[...] it a “mistake” for Fox news to denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to “libertarian mailing [...]
Pingback by Fox News Dirty Tricks Against Ron Paul No “Mistake” | ClipsNewsNetwork | February 17th, 2011
[...] denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. milita… by attributing it to “libertarian mailing [...]
Pingback by Fox News Dirty Tricks Against Ron Paul No “Mistake” : Dr. Leonard Coldwell | February 17th, 2011
[...] it a “mistake” for Fox News to denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to “libertarian mailing [...]
Pingback by Faux News’ Anti-Ron-Paul History « XlibertyX | February 19th, 2011
[...] it a “mistake” for Fox News to denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to “libertarian mailing [...]
Pingback by Old NewsFox Propaganda and Coverup: the past Revisited « www.TheReaganWing.com | February 20th, 2011
[...] News denigrated the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to “libertarian mailing [...]
Comment by cheap hats | April 22nd, 2011
Searching around on yahoo guided me to this post which I thought was extremely informative. Nicely layed out and extremely uncomplicated to read even for those who are not that great in english. I will stay tuned for future updates.
Comment by cheap nfl hats | June 10th, 2011
Dear friends, thank you for visiting our website ,we are an international trade company,which specializes in http://www.hatscapsland.com/. We cheap nfl hats at competitive price,providing a huge range of hats of different teams,such as Arizona Cardinal,Atlanda Falcons ,Baltimore Ravens,etc.You can buy cheap caps. Welcome to visist here.
Comment by cheap ray ban sunglasses | June 22nd, 2011
This is worth to read,everyone enjoy it.
ray ban sunglasses sale.
Pingback by For those who support the TROOPS - Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - City-Data Forum | June 23rd, 2011
[...] [...]
Comment by Win | June 29th, 2011
That’s definitely an Epic Win!
Comment by buy cheap sunglasses | July 12th, 2011
so nice site for me! how much important site for us. thanks for your free!!!
Comment by fitted caps cheap | August 8th, 2011
This is a top notch quality New Era Hats & Caps! Newest styles and brands of hats & caps including DC Hats,New York Yankees Hats, Red Bull Hats,Monster Energy Hats and sports team haps.
Comment by Cheap Yankees hats | September 1st, 2011
Thank landlord impartiality. Come up with such a good article to share with us. This is the official information from articles I and my friends need. Thanks again!
Comment by Air Max store | September 3rd, 2011
Its a great start of the day with a website like this. very informative , im now one of the regular visitor of your web. Thanks.
Comment by cheap Prada handbags | September 7th, 2011
I read this informative article and I really enjoy reading it. I hope see more articles on this topic by you soon.
Comment by cheap prada handbags | September 9th, 2011
I am glad to found such useful post. I really increased my knowledge after read your post which will be beneficial for me.
Comment by fake oakley | September 12th, 2011
I very much to like and agree with your point of view.
Comment by cheap air max shop | September 14th, 2011
Interesting posts here.. gracias for sharing so much in your blog.. Greets.
Comment by griffey sneakers | September 14th, 2011
beautiful post
Pingback by Ron Paul Roundup | Free The Animal | September 20th, 2011
[...] was the story about Paul raising more from the military than any other candidate last quarter. He doubled the amount this quarter, which was trice as much as the two runners up, McCain and [...]
Comment by Bailey Button Triplet Boots | September 20th, 2011
Nice post.Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful!I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post thanks!
Comment by hermes birkins | September 20th, 2011
it seems to be insteresting for your paper here.
Comment by Moncler | September 21st, 2011
http://www.moncler2doudoune.com/“>Moncler
Comment by ray ban wayfarers | September 26th, 2011
It’s good article.
Comment by arthritis advice | September 27th, 2011
Good post.You did a good work, and offer more information Effective for us! Thank you. This is my first time II have visited here. I found a lot of interesting information in your blog.
Comment by cheap LV handbag | October 7th, 2011
Another ridiculous cam with regards to co-existence related to extraordinary creator handbag along with goody. Today Karissa Shannon offers a greater occurrence.tisa snapback I hate so that you can hook up Chanel quilted home household leather dither suitcases utilizing the glimmer Whitney Township because the woman may be found combination for the best destructor pertaining to method having cereal or simply fizzy treats which can position the great Chanel travelling tote perfect below. I actually just about sleek for any mindset which usually indulgence are unable to get together along with type false lv bags having said that Karissa Shannon affirms I am just incorrect.This type of Cheap Gucci Saleastounding person boasts a break pertaining to foiling him or her trim fantastic obtain applying large totes, who has ended up showed via the person recent picture where your lover honours anyone the len’s by using a exceptional ; ) as well as a huge Gucci published artificial leather-based carrier. And even, I only uncover the girl loves to provoke my own desired by means of as well as craze coupled with cheap LV handbag! That’s exactly a troublesome girl! I at this moment feel anxious to catch at least 18 extra-large Lv Initialed or monogrammed Breeze haul and even get rid of it Could not include this kind of fun.Getting slim options for really like a great deal more flexibility.
Comment by Piumini Uomo 2011 | October 13th, 2011
Piumini Moncler Donna una rappresentazione raffinata di una bella Giubbotti Moncler giacca di fronte a persone, oggi, in giù nel settore, ma Piumini Uomo 2011 senza di essa le cose possonoessere alti con solo fiammifero Lu gallo. Moncler 2009, il primo flagship store in Cina a Shanghai, il registro ufficiale in Cina.Moncler Donna Cappott Modifica questo paragrafo in basso Re: Moncler (mongolo orale) storia Storia Moncler inizia durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale. Occupazione tedesca della Francia ed è stato poi diviso in due, in aree libere, Moncler Giubbotti Uomini il team di reclutamento è stato abolito, sostituito da un
Comment by cheap snapback hats | October 25th, 2011
The crown is the part Wholesale cheap hatsthat is open at the top of the head between the different types of crown corks, crown conical, double the average. These days more people on things like cheap baseball hats, wool caps and the Seahawks to the Super Bowl can next time when there was a better use for the purpose of the cap and a completely different way. http://www.hatsmvp.org Therefore, it is an interesting story to watch. PlayoffsThe highlight is the part that is also known as the visor. This is the part that is rigid and provides protection for the edge is the part that does not exist in baseball caps and do not cover the entire circumference of the sleeve with a rigid projection.
Comment by cheap uggs boots online | November 3rd, 2011
A variety of i appreciate creating ws signal the effort to share it, Personally i think strongly over it as well as such as studying an incredible bargain considerably more with this matter.
Comment by Uggs Boot Outlet | November 3rd, 2011
I came to your article from another article and am really interested in this learning about this, I feel strongly about information and love learning more on this. If possible, as you gain expertise, It is extremely helpful for me.
Comment by Nicolas Oguinn | November 12th, 2011
Wonderful site you got here! Please maintain updating, I will def read more. It’ll be in my bookmarks so greater update!
Comment by cheap ray ban sunglasses | November 13th, 2011
cheap ray ban sunglasses, cheap ray bans,ray ban sale
Comment by replica belts | November 15th, 2011
We pretty much appreciate your blog post. You can find a multitude of techniques we could put it to decent use with a minimum of effort on time and hard earned cash.
Comment by discount ray bans | November 15th, 2011
the wayfarer sunglasses store operate some years ago, big discount ray bans at the same time, at wind winter so I need to search for the cheap ray bans sunglasses.
Comment by daily deals | December 7th, 2011
JCPenney
Comment by make your own beats | December 8th, 2011
These articles powerhouses are an asset to Yahoo and not the other way nearly. But do you believe Google is heading to sit back again and view simply anyone make big bucks off of their top rankings?
Comment by wholesale new era cap | December 12th, 2011
China’s rate of inflation has fallen in November to its slowest pace in 14-months.
Comment by Anderson Hoblit | January 10th, 2012
The faster SSD is by Samsung while the slower one is Toshiba’s. I’d like to say the difference is only between Samsung and Toshiba but there could also be other factors. Anyway, SSD is still faster than ordinary hard drive so speed is not a problem. But as for me, my 64GB MacBook Air became a bit sluggish after I updated to Lion OS X.
Comment by Elvina Ince | January 11th, 2012
An newsworthy discourse is worth scuttlebutt. I believe that you should make many on this subject, it power not be a prejudice human but mostly group are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers like your About Susan Busa.
Comment by Bruno | February 2nd, 2012
It?s really a great and helpful piece of information. I’m pleased which you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.